Creator
What We Cover
Our homepage covers casino comparisons and the implications for UK players. The betting sites guide focuses on sports markets and bookmaker account terms. The licence verification guide explains a practical public-record check. These topics are connected, but evidence for one does not automatically answer the others.
How our assessments are built
Our review framework combines company-to-licence matching, general and restricted-territory terms, registration and identity-verification steps, game inspection, payment policies and support questions. Bonus analysis examines wagering basis, game weighting, maximum bets, expiry and cashout restrictions. These checks provide the basis for an assessment; individual findings must identify the work actually performed.
Sources and scope of evidence
Use regulator records for licence checks and operator terms for account and promotion rules. Record the source and date alongside each finding. Direct observations describe the particular registration step, game inspection or support exchange involved. Published withdrawal times remain operator claims unless supported by transaction evidence; account access is not a payment test.
Where records conflict or are unavailable, leave the question unresolved. A source-review date records a document check, not a new account or transaction test. This distinction keeps the assessment useful without extending a finding beyond what its evidence establishes.
Before an operator recommendation
- Match the company, licence record and exact domain.
- Establish relevant country restrictions and authorisation.
- Read the material product, payment and promotion terms.
- Label operator-advertised information separately from observed results.
- Explain limitations and keep responsible gambling context visible.
A recommendation should identify its basis and the date of the relevant evidence. We do not invent ratings, transaction records, credentials or a testing team to fill a design.
Corrections and updates
Material changes to a company, domain, licence or account rule require another source check before the affected recommendation is renewed. The article date should reflect an actual editorial update. A correction should identify what changed; it should not make an old observation appear newly tested.
Comparison scope and editorial standards
The homepage comparison covers a selected set of brands; it is not a whole-market survey or a quality ranking. Factual claims require supporting evidence, and official records take precedence over promotional material when they conflict.
CuracaoBookies is not a regulator, gambling operator or dispute-resolution body. For independent help with gambling harm, visit our support page.
